Key result
Takotsubo syndrome management lacks standardization, with contradictory beta-blocker and RAASi data alongside ~78% anxiety or depression.
Why the study?
Due to a lack of randomized clinical trials and harmonized recommendations, long-term management strategies for takotsubo syndrome are based predominantly on observational studies and clinical experience.
What are the current approaches and their efficacy for the long-term treatment of patients with takotsubo syndrome?
Systematic Review
What are the current approaches and their efficacy for the long-term treatment of patients with takotsubo syndrome?
Long-term management of takotsubo syndrome lacks standardized, evidence-based guidelines, highlighting the need for individualized therapy and psycho-emotional support.
Long-term takotsubo management lacks standardization; leaves optimal beta-blocker, RAAS inhibitor, and psycho-emotional strategies open for randomized trials.
Takotsubo syndrome (TS) is an acute, usually reversible type of heart failure that mimics acute coronary syndrome and is often associated with stress, especially in postmenopausal women. Despite the traditional perception of TS as a benign condition, modern studies have found a significant risk of serious in-hospital complications, as well as a poor long-term prognosis. Due to the lack of randomized clinical trials and harmonized recommendations, long-term management strategies are based predominantly on observational studies and clinical experience. Objective. To analyze current approaches to the long-term treatment of patients with takotsubo syndrome based on literature data. Materials and methods. A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed database from January 1, 2010, to November 1, 2025, using the keywords «stress cardiomyopathy», «cardiomyopathy takotsubo», «broken heart syndrome», «apical ballooning syndrome», «tako-tsubo syndrome», and «transient apical ballooning syndrome». Results. Long-term management of TS is not standardized. Correction of psycho-emotional disorders (anxiety/depressive disorders were reported in 53—78% of patients) and cooperation of cardiologists and psychiatrists are essential. Data on the efficacy of beta-blockers and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors for secondary prophylaxis are contradictory; statins and antiplatelet agents are not indicated in isolated TS. Pathogenetic methods are considered promising: antioxidants (α-lipoic acid, tempol), natural compounds (icariin, pomegranate peel extract), as well as new classes of drugs (sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors). However, the clinical benefit of these drugs is not confirmed. Conclusion. The optimal strategy includes individualized drug therapy, active detection and correction of psycho-emotional disorders, as well as further research into pathogenetically oriented therapies for takotsubo syndrome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Evdokimov et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Takotsubo syndrome. Long-term management strategies (including beta-blockers, RAAS inhibitors, and psycho-emotional correction) was evaluated. Long-term management strategies for Takotsubo syndrome lack standardization, with contradictory data on beta-blockers and RAAS inhibitors, and anxiety/depressive disorders in 53-78% of patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: