Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
May 29, 2026Journal of Ethics and Social PhilosophyOpen Access

Against Broome's "Against Denialism"

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

KBKabir S. BakshiUniversity of Pittsburgh

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Critical evaluation critiques Broome's denialism arguments, highlighting tensions with carbon offsetting implications.

Key Points

  • The paper aims to critically assess John Broome's arguments against individual denialism regarding greenhouse gas emissions.
  • Isolates and clarifies Broome's position on denialism.
  • Analyzes potential inconsistencies in Broome's defense of carbon offsetting.
  • Explores broader implications for applied ethics.
  • Identified that Broome's argument overgenerates to a problematic extent.
  • Highlighted tensions between Broome's stance on denialism and carbon offsetting.
  • Noted implications for ongoing debates in applied ethics.

Cite This Study

Kabir S. Bakshi (2023) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192e68fab5b468c441776dhttps://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v24i1.2419
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Revisiting the social cost of carbon2017 · 1,412 citations
  2. 2Responsibility and the ‘Pie Fallacy’2021 · 31 citations