6110 Background: GDF15 is a stress-response cytokine implicated in systemic inflammation and cancer-related wasting. We assessed whether baseline circulating GDF15 captures an HPV-stratified nutritional/body composition phenotype and whether longitudinal GDF15 changes relate to treatment outcome in OPSCC. Methods: We analyzed a prospective cohort of OPSCC patients (pts) undergoing curative intent treatment (CIT; surgery and radiotherapy [RT]-based) with available baseline plasma GDF15. HPV status was defined by dual detection (p16 INK4a and HPV DNA). Baseline nutritional status (Patient Generated Subjective Global Assessment), symptom burden (nutrition-impact composite score), body mass index (BMI), and CT-derived skeletal muscle index (SMI) were analyzed when available. Response assessment was performed 8-12 weeks after CIT, classifying cases as no evidence of disease (NED) vs evidence of disease (ED). Longitudinal GDF15 was analyzed using linear mixed-effects models (LMEN) (random intercept) including interactions of time with response status and induction chemotherapy. Results: We included 138 pts (HPVnegative [−] n=82; HPVpositive [+] n=56). Stage III–IV was more frequent in HPV- vs HPV+ (85.4% vs 30.4%; p<0.001) and ECOG 0 less common (9.8% vs 51.8%; p<0.0001). RT-based treatment predominated (85.5%) mainly chemoradiotherapy ± induction (82.6%). Baseline GDF15 was higher in HPV- vs HPV+ (median 1591 vs 803 pg/mL; p<0.001). HPV− pts showed worse nutritional phenotype: lower BMI (22.7 vs 27.2 kg /m²; p=0.001), more severe malnutrition (37.8% vs 7.1%; p<0.001), higher symptom burden (1.90±0.94 vs 1.39±0.71; p=0.002) and higher sarcopenia (34.1% vs 16.1%; p=0.029). In pts with CT body composition (n=89), SMI was lower in HPV− vs HPV+ (45.6 vs 53.6 cm²/m²; p=0.010). Baseline GDF15 differed by nutritional status (p=0.014) and was associated with symptom burden and SMI (both p<0.05). In LMEN, GDF15 increased significantly from baseline to end of treatment (β=2264 pg/mL; p<0.001). Baseline HPV positivity was independently associated with lower GDF15 (β=−980 pg/mL; p<0.001). At the end of treatment, NED was associated with lower GDF15 compared with ED (β=−1141 pg/mL; p=0.011). Induction chemotherapy showed no significant effect on GDF15 change (β=−448 pg/mL at end of treatment; p=0.22). No significant interaction between time and baseline HPV status was observed (p=0.26) indicating comparable longitudinal trajectories of GDF15 in HPV+ and HPV-pts. Conclusions: Baseline GDF15 is strongly HPV-dependent and reflects a multidimensional nutritional and muscle phenotype. GDF15 increases during CIT and lower end-of-treatment GDF15 is independently associated with NED, whereas induction chemotherapy does not significantly modify GDF15 change.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arribas et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: