PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026International Journal of Molecular Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Heart-Type Fatty Acid-Binding Protein (H-FABP) as a Candidate Adjunctive Biomarker for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Cardiotoxicity: Linking Early Immune–Metabolic Myocardial Injury with Translational Cardio-Oncology

View Full Paper
VQVincenzo QuagliarielloMBMassimiliano BerrettaFMFabrizio Maurea

Key Result

Heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP) shows potential as an early adjunctive biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitor-related cardiotoxicity, though large prospective studies are required.

Key Points

  • This review evaluates the potential of H-FABP as an adjunctive biomarker for early detection of myocardial injury associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
  • Critically examines biological rationale and preclinical evidence for H-FABP as a biomarker.
  • Reviews clinical data supporting H-FABP's role in detecting early immune-mediated myocardial injury during ICI therapy.
  • Highlights the need for large prospective studies integrating H-FABP with other existing biomarkers.
  • H-FABP elevations may occur before observable increases in troponin, indicating early myocardial injury.
  • Existing evidence suggests H-FABP's rapid response to metabolic membrane stress, supporting its biomarker potential.
  • Current studies show limitations in the evidence for H-FABP's clinical implementation, necessitating further research.

Structured PICO

Does H-FABP serve as an effective adjunctive biomarker for early immune-mediated myocardial injury during ICI therapy?

P
Population
Patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) at risk for cardiovascular immune-related adverse events (irAEs)
I
Intervention
Heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP) as an adjunctive biomarker
O
Outcome
Early detection of immune-mediated myocardial injurysurrogate

H-FABP is proposed as a candidate adjunctive biomarker for the early detection of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related cardiotoxicity, potentially preceding troponin elevation.

Limitations

  • Current evidence remains limited
  • Large prospective multicenter studies are required before routine clinical implementation can be considered
  • Requires large prospective multicenter studies integrating H-FABP with hs-cTns, natriuretic peptides, CMR, and clinical outcomes

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the therapeutic landscape of oncology but are increasingly associated with cardiovascular immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including myocarditis, heart failure, arrhythmias, and vascular complications. Among these, ICI-associated myocarditis represents the most severe manifestation, often characterized by high mortality and challenging early diagnosis. Detecting subclinical myocardial injury before irreversible cardiomyocyte necrosis occurs remains a major unmet need in contemporary cardio-oncology. This narrative expert review critically examines the biological rationale, preclinical evidence, and emerging clinical data supporting the potential role of heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP) as an adjunctive biomarker of early immune-mediated myocardial injury during ICI therapy. H-FABP is a small cytosolic lipid chaperone abundantly expressed in cardiomyocytes and rapidly released into the circulation following subtle membrane destabilization and metabolic stress, frequently preceding detectable troponin elevation in other forms of myocardial injury. Experimental studies support a mechanistic association between H-FABP release, inflammasome activation, cytokine amplification, mitochondrial dysfunction, and immune–metabolic cardiomyocyte stress. Preliminary clinical observations further suggest that H-FABP elevations may occur during ICI treatment even in the absence of overt myocarditis or concomitant increases in high-sensitivity cardiac troponins (hs-cTns). Although H-FABP cannot replace hs-cTn, which remains the cornerstone biomarker for the diagnosis of clinically significant ICI-associated myocarditis, its rapid kinetics and sensitivity to early metabolic membrane injury support its potential role as an investigational adjunctive biomarker for early surveillance and risk stratification. This approach may be particularly relevant in patients receiving high-risk combination ICI regimens or in individuals with pre-existing cardiovascular disease. However, current evidence remains limited, and large prospective multicenter studies integrating H-FABP with hs-cTns, natriuretic peptides, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and clinical outcomes are required before routine clinical implementation can be considered.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Quagliariello et al. (2026) conducted a review in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Cardiotoxicity. Heart-Type Fatty Acid-Binding Protein (H-FABP) was evaluated. Heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP) shows potential as an early adjunctive biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitor-related cardiotoxicity, though large prospective studies are required.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192ea9fab5b468c4417deahttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27114842
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Prognostic Utility of Heart-Type Fatty Acid Binding Protein in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes2006 · 195 citations
  2. 2Heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP) as an early diagnostic biomarker in patients with acute chest pain2015 · 55 citations
  3. 3Diagnostic and prognostic utility of heart-type fatty acid binding proteins in cardiovascular diseases and risk factors − an updated review of the literature2025
  4. 4Heart-type fatty acid-binding protein: an overlooked cardiac biomarker2020 · 81 citations
  5. 5Heart-type fatty acid-binding protein in the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis2010 · 71 citations