Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction of a new abstract scheme defining ideals of non-piecewise syndetic sets, suggesting broader applicability.
We introduce an abstract scheme (Fi)i∈I which can be considered as a framework for defining all possible versions of ideals of non-piecewise syndetic sets in a common language. We prove that the family ∇((iFi∈I)) = {Z:i∈I ∀j∈I ∃F∈Fj ∀G∈Fi ∃ G ⊆ F ∧ G ∩ Z = ∅} always forms an ideal. It is shown that, under a certain additional condition, this ideal is equal to the collection of non-piecewise syndetic sets relative to (iFi∈I) . This correspondence holds in many important cases, including the integer lattice. Moreover, we prove that anyσ F ideal has such representation with finite sets. Finally, we show that the Marczewski-Burstin representation is a particular case of our general abstract scheme.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nowik et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: