Explores cosmic parameters in the Concentric Orbital Cosmological Model, highlighting new observable connections.
The Concentric Orbital Cosmological Model (COCM) parametrises the Hubble rate as an oscillatory modulation at xed frequency ωz = 11.1991 in redshift space, treating the orbital geometry as circular (e = 0). This paper develops four extensions of that baseline, all traceable to results in the corpus. (1) Second harmonic. The circular orbit is the zeroth-order xed point of any smooth eccentricity distribution. For e>0, a second harmonic at 2ωz appears with amplitude ratio P(2ωz )/P(ωz ) ∝en, n ≈4.86. DESI DR3 can constrain e independently of A0 and φ. (2) CMBDR3 connection. The invariant J = (V0ε/τ)2 bridges the primordial sector (z ∼1090) and the late-time sector (z ∼1) through the bulk geometry of C0. A non-zero e implies JCMB ̸= JDR3, providing the rst direct measurement of bulk dynamics across cosmic time. (3) COCM+w0wa coexistence. The three possible DR3 outcomes are identied and formalised: COCM+w0wa coexist (Scenario 1, currently favoured, χ2 r = 4.7), COCM only (Scenario 2), and neither (Scenario 3, documented falsication). The w0wa signal is explained as the O(e2) correction to the circular-orbit baseline: the DESI DR2 w0wa detection is interpreted as an incomplete sampling of an oscillatory signal, not as a smooth dark energy component. (4) Cosmic string loop hypothesis. Rn is identied as a candidate cosmic string loop, consistent with NANOGrav constraints (Gµ∼10−11) and naturally satisfying τC0 ≫τRn . This is a working hypothesis, not a derived result. All results carry explicit claim labels. The primary prediction ωz = 11.1991, registered on 14 May 2026 (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20178768), is unaected.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
José Luis Vázquez González (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: