This paper places India's expanding surveillance infrastructure in conversation with George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949). Drawing on Michel Foucault's panopticism, Shoshana Zuboff's surveillance capitalism, and David Lyon's critical surveillance studies, it argues that the Aadhaar biometric system, the Centralised Monitoring System (CMS), the National Intelligence Grid (NATGRID), facial recognition programmes, and the documented deployment of Pegasus spyware together constitute a form of digital authoritarianism with structural and ideological affinities to Orwell's Oceania. Rather than reducing India to a dystopia—it remains a constitutional democracy with functioning institutions—this paper reads Orwell as a diagnostic instrument, tracing where democratic norms are being quietly eroded by the logic of total visibility. The comparative analysis shows that the parallels are not superficial: surveillance in India, as in Oceania, is legitimised through the language of welfare and security, targets minority and dissident populations through social sorting, and generates a chilling effect on political expression that threatens the interior conditions for authentic democratic participation.
Md Anjarul Islam (Thu,) studied this question.