Analyzes trends in impaired driving due to alcohol and cannabis in Chile, revealing behavioral shifts following legal changes.
OBJECTIVE: law (2014), and comparatively weaker cannabis enforcement. METHODS: = 26,242 licensed drivers). Outcomes were self-reported DUIA and DUIC, analyzed separately and jointly. Survey year served as a proxy for exposure to Chile's traffic laws. Descriptive prevalence estimates were calculated across waves. Temporal patterns were examined using survey-weighted logistic regression models for DUIA and DUIC and multinomial logistic regression models comparing DUIA only, DUIC only, and combined DUIA and DUIC (DUIA&C) relative to no impaired driving. Models were adjusted for sex, age, age at alcohol onset, household income, and administrative region. RESULTS: < .001), indicating that while alcohol-impaired driving decreased, cannabis-impaired driving rose. CONCLUSIONS: laws, DUIA in Chile declined substantially, suggesting the contribution of strengthened alcohol-focused interventions. In contrast, DUIC increased modestly, suggesting potential substitution behaviors in response to stricter alcohol regulations and weaker cannabis enforcement. These findings highlight the importance of considering cross-substance dynamics in road safety policies and underscore the need for integrated strategies that target both alcohol and cannabis, to prevent unintended behavioral adaptations and enhance overall traffic safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nazif-Munoz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: