PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology0 citations

Safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of lurbinectedin (lurbi) in pediatric patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) solid tumors and preliminary antitumor activity in pediatric and young adult pts with R/R Ewing sarcoma (EwS): Results from a phase 1 study.

View Full Paper
JBJulia Lynne Glade BenderMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterJPJoseph G. PresseyCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical CenterLWL WagnerDuke Medical Center

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of lurbinectedin in pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory solid tumors, particularly Ewing sarcoma.
  • Phase 1 open-label trial (NCT05734066) conducted at multiple centers.
  • Evaluated safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics of lurbinectedin monotherapy in patients aged 2-18 years with relapsed solid tumors.
  • Recommended phase 2 dose determined using Bayesian optimal interval design, starting at 3.2 mg/m² administered intravenously over 1 hour every three weeks.
  • 21 patients received treatment, with 17 receiving 3.2 mg/m² and 4 receiving 4.0 mg/m².
  • Among those treated with 3.2 mg/m², 8 (47%) experienced grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events, primarily anemia and platelet count decrease.
  • The confirmed objective response rate in evaluable patients with relapsed Ewing sarcoma was 18%, with a disease control rate of 55%.

Abstract

11518 Background: About 30% of pediatric cancers are solid tumors. EwS is the second most common bone tumor among children and young adults; 5-year survival rates for R/R EwS are <15%. Lurbi is a trabectedin analogue that alkylates DNA and blocks transcription of EWS-FLI1, a primary driver of EwS. In a phase 2 basket trial, lurbi demonstrated an objective response rate (ORR; complete response CR or partial response PR) of 14% and disease control rate (DCR; CR, PR, or stable disease) of 57% in 28 adults (median age, 33 years y) with R/R EwS. Here, we report phase 1 results from a multicenter, open-label study (NCT05734066) of lurbi in pediatric and young adult pts with R/R solid tumors including EwS. Methods: Part 1 evaluated the safety, tolerability, PK, and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of lurbi monotherapy in pediatric pts (aged 2–18 y) with R/R solid tumors. RP2D selection used a Bayesian optimal interval design starting with the approved adult dosage, 3.2 mg/m 2 lurbi IV over 1 hour every 3 weeks. Two additional cohorts were treated at the RP2D: a safety cohort for pts aged <18 y and a histology-specific safety and efficacy cohort for pts aged 2–30 y with R/R EwS. Tumor responses were assessed every 6 weeks per RECIST v1.1. Results: As of Oct 22, 2025, 21 pts received ≥1 dose of lurbi (3.2 mg/m 2 , n = 17; 4.0 mg/m 2 , n = 4). Median (range) age was 16 (10–25) y; 13 (62%) pts had received ≥3 prior lines of treatment (Tx). Median (range) lurbi cycles administered was 3 (1–18); 3 (14%) pts were still receiving lurbi; 18 (86%) discontinued Tx. At 4 mg/m 2 , dose-limiting pulmonary edema and rhabdomyolysis/acute kidney injury were observed. Among pts receiving lurbi 3.2 mg/m², 8 (47%) had grade ≥3 Tx-related adverse events (TRAEs); anemia (5 29%) and platelet count decrease (5 29%) were most common (Table). For pts aged ≥6 y, the RP2D was 3.2 mg/m 2 ; accrual of pts aged <6 y is ongoing to determine RP2D. Although geometric mean (Geo CV%) C max (163 µg/L 105%) and AUC inf (1893 µg∙h/L 126%) were higher in children/young adults vs adults in the phase 2 basket trial (increased 53% and 244%, respectively), there was substantial overlap in drug exposures. Among 11 evaluable pts with R/R EwS receiving lurbi 3.2 mg/m², the confirmed ORR was 18%, and the DCR was 55%; 2 responders were progression free at their last assessments (5.7 and 6.9 months). Conclusions: Based on these data, lurbi had a manageable safety profile, predictable PK properties, and encouraging preliminary clinical activity in pts with R/R EwS. Phase 2 expansion in pts ≤30 y with R/R EwS is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT05734066 . TRAEs in all pts and by dose. n (%) All N = 21 3.2 mg/m 2 n = 17 4.0 mg/m 2 n = 4 Any TRAE 21 (100) 17 (100) 4 (100) Grade ≥3 12 (57) 8 (47) 4 (100) Serious 4 (19) 2 (12) 2 (50) Led to Tx discontinuation 1 (5) 0 1 (25) Led to death 1 (5) 0 1 (25) a a Due to acute kidney injury.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bender et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192f1bfab5b468c4418791https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.11518
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Real-world safety and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) of lurbinectedin (lurbi) in patients (pts) with small cell lung cancer (SCLC): Jazz EMERGE 402 updated analysis.2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2Real-world (RW) effectiveness and safety of lurbinectedin (lurbi) for previously treated extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC): Final primary and subgroup analysis results of Jazz EMERGE 402.2026
  3. 3A pivotal bridging study of lurbinectedin as second-line therapy in Chinese patients with small cell lung cancer2024 · 10 citations
  4. 4Randomized controlled, open-label, phase IIb/III study of lurbinectedin in combination with doxorubicin versus doxorubicin alone as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic leiomyosarcoma.2024 · 2 citations
  5. 5Pooled safety analysis of lurbinectedin plus irinotecan in patients with advanced solid tumors.2026