Systematic review shows ADCs improve survival in HER2-low and TNBC, but cross-resistance limits effectiveness.
e12548 Background: Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) have demonstrated superior efficacy over chemotherapy in HER2-low and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, real-world outcomes of sequential ADC use and the extent of cross-resistance remain poorly defined. We performed a systematic review to evaluate randomized and real-world evidence on efficacy, safety, and cross-resistance of ADC sequencing. Methods: Phase III randomized controlled trials and retrospective real-world studies evaluating ADCs in HER2-low and TNBC were reviewed. Hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were pooled using an inverse-variance method. Response rates, safety outcomes, and real-world sequencing data were synthesized narratively. Risk of bias was assessed using ROB-2. Results: Pooled analysis of three phase III trials demonstrated a significant OS benefit with ADCs compared with chemotherapy (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50–0.87; P = 0.004), representing a 34% reduction in mortality risk. PFS was also significantly improved (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.33–0.63; P < 0.00001), with substantial heterogeneity (OS I² = 80%; PFS I² = 87%). ADCs showed higher objective response rates, including sacituzumab govitecan in ASCENT (31% vs 4%) and trastuzumab deruxtecan with ORR up to 57.3% in DESTINY-Breast studies. All trials were open-label, resulting in some risk of bias. Real-world data revealed reduced efficacy with sequential ADC therapy. In a multicenter retrospective cohort, 53% of patients exhibited cross-resistance to a second ADC. A separate institutional cohort showed shorter real-world PFS with second ADC use in ~75% of patients, with PTEN loss associated with resistance. ADCs demonstrated manageable toxicity profiles and favorable patient-reported outcomes compared with chemotherapy. Conclusions: Although ADCs improve survival outcomes in HER2-low and TNBC, real-world evidence suggests substantial cross-resistance with sequential use. Prospective sequencing trials are essential for defining optimal treatment strategies and overcoming resistance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agarwal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: