Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
1,4‐Dioxane (dioxane), a suspected carcinogen, is a persistent environmental pollutant that is difficult to remove from contaminated sites. This work investigated the feasibility of vegetative uptake as a site remediation alternative. In hydroponic studies, hybrid poplar cuttings ( Populus deltoides × nigra , DN 34, Imperial Carolina) removed 23 mg/L dioxane rapidly. Within 9 days, a removal of 54.0 ± 19.0% was achieved. This removal corresponded to a transpiration stream concentration factor of 0.72 ± 0.07. Poplars also effectively remediated a dioxane‐spiked soil (10 mg/kg). Only 18.8 ± 7.9% of the initial dioxane spike remained in planted soil after 15 days, compared with 72.0 ± 7.7% remaining in sterilized, unplanted soil. In both hydroponic and soil experiments, 76 to 83% of the dioxane taken up by poplars was transpired from leaf surfaces to the atmosphere, where it can be readily dispersed and photodegraded. These results suggest that phytoremediation is a viable alternative to remove dioxane from contaminated sites and should be considered for other hydrophilic contaminants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aitchison et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: