Exploratory study examines sustainability integration in pilotage training, indicating gaps and enablers for improvement.
Maritime pilotage is increasingly shaped by decarbonisation, digitalisation, and wider sustainability pressures, yet the integration of sustainability thinking into pilotage training remains insufficiently understood. This study addresses that gap by examining sustainability thinking not simply as an issue of awareness, but as a problem of training integration in a safety-critical professional context. Using an exploratory, theory-informed quantitative design, the study reinterprets primary survey data from 39 active maritime pilots through a deductive analytical framework combining sustainability pillars, integration domains, sustainability thinking sub-competencies, composite analytical conditions, and structured interpretive synthesis. The findings show that sustainability-oriented thinking is already present in pilotage practice, but that its integration into training remains uneven. It appears strongest where it is embedded in operational judgement and socially established professional norms, and weaker where it depends on pedagogical reinforcement, institutional consistency, and digital credibility. The main challenge is therefore not the absence of sustainability awareness, but the inconsistent translation of that awareness into trainable, repeatable, and professionally reinforced competence. By deriving barriers, enablers, drivers, and risks, the study offers a more applied framework for understanding sustainability thinking as a training and professional development issue in maritime pilotage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Issa-Zadeh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: