3582 Background: The incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC; diagnosis < 50 years) is rising at an alarming rate. EOCRC often exhibits distinct clinical features compared to late-onset colorectal cancer (LOCRC), yet the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. This study aimed to characterize a cohort of EOCRC patients by integrating DNA methylation, gene expression, and metabolomic profiles to identify age-specific molecular drivers. Methods: We performed an integrated multi-omic analysis on a cohort of 42 patients, comprising 16 EOCRC and 26 LOCRC cases that were collected from the Total Cancer Care at the Ohio State University. For each patient, fresh-frozen tumor tissue and paired adjacent normal tissue were analyzed using reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS). Parallel transcriptomic profiling was conducted by RNA-seq on all tumor samples. Additionally, systemic metabolic signatures were captured from plasma using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Functional integration of differentially methylated regions (DMRs), gene expression signatures, and metabolomic profiles was performed using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) to identify enriched canonical pathways. Results: Integrative analysis revealed a divergent molecular fingerprint in EOCRC compared to LOCRC. At the epigenomic and transcriptomic levels, EOCRC tumors demonstrated significant enrichment in neurotransmitter-related pathways, such as CREB signaling in neurons and ion channel transport, alongside a pronounced activation of G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling. Furthermore, we identified a distinct immune-related signature characterized by the activation of phagosome formation and S100 family signaling pathways. These intracellular alterations were mirrored by a unique systemic metabolic profile involving the G alpha signaling pathway and the transport of vitamins, nucleosides, bile salts, and amine compounds. In addition, we identified a multi-omic signature of 11 genes that exhibit both differential gene expression between EOCRC and LOCRC tumors and significant tumor-specific methylation drift relative to adjacent normal tissue. Notably, this signature is enriched with established epigenetic clock/aging markers, including LEP , PLA2G4F , CYP2E1 , GCM2 , ZNF418 , and MINAR1 , making them ideal candidates for early detection by liquid biopsies or risk-stratification tools for EOCRC. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that EOCRC is a biologically distinct entity driven by specific epigenetic and immune dysregulation. The simultaneous enrichment of neurotransmitter pathways and GPCR signaling suggests that EOCRC development may be uniquely influenced by neuro-epithelial interactions. The 11-gene signature enriched with epigenetic aging markers may serve as screening or surveillance tools for EOCRC patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: