PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 20260 citationsOpen Access

PRE-REGISTERED PREDICTIONS ADAPTATIONS 2: Conscious Geometry Theory (CGT) Applied to COGITATE (Experiment 1 Data)

View Full Paper
PFPhileas Foxx

Key Points

  • To pre-register predictions for theta task-evoked activity in the context of Conscious Geometry Theory applied to COGITATE Experiment 1 data.
  • Pre-registration of predicted theta frequency using the formula θ_task = (Y−1)/ln(R) = 6.3694 Hz.
  • Defined acceptance windows for theta frequency: broad [6.0, 6.8] Hz and tight [6.219, 6.663] Hz.
  • Set criteria for falsification based on MEG population mean.
  • Theta frequency predicted at 6.3694 Hz falls within the broad acceptance window.
  • Falsification criteria established for mean outside [6.0, 6.8] Hz, ensuring robustness of predictions.

Abstract

The 2nd Pre-registered predictions adaptions (so the third pre-reg predictions document on CGT COGITATE Experiment 1 Data). This is the pre-registration document for the A. 1 task-evoked theta prediction, following the Paper 41 (parent COGITATE pre-registration) Prediction: θₜask = (Y−1) /ln (R) = 6. 3694 HzTier: IMPLIED (explicit, not DERIVED) Acceptance window (broad): 6. 0, 6. 8 HzAcceptance window (tight): 6. 219, 6. 663 Hz (within iEEG SD) Falsification: MEG full-bundle population mean outside 6. 0, 6. 8 HzApologies in advance for the formatting here. I'm short on time with this one and I'm running the mEEG full data experiment tomorrow (28th May 2026).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Phileas Foxx (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192f88fab5b468c4418ba1https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20416523
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper