Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative cross-sectional study examines CDI in preterm children, identifying key psychological predictors for intervention.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine psychopathological factors associated with Cognitive Disengagement Syndrome (CDS) in preterm school-aged children, while controlling for the potential confounding effects of inattention, emotional problems, and peer difficulties. METHODS: A comparative cross-sectional design was utilized with 181 children (89 preterm, 92 full-term). Assessment tools included the Turgay DSM-IV-Based Screening Scale, the Barkley Child Attention Scale, and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Group differences were analyzed using t-tests. A univariate ANCOVA was conducted to assess the effect of prematurity on CDS symptom scores after adjusting for birth weight, age, gender, and psychopathological covariates. RESULTS: The preterm group had significantly lower birth weight and gestational age (p < .001). While no significant difference was found in raw CDS symptom scores between groups (p = .603), preterm children scored significantly higher on the SDQ Peer Problems subscale (p = .002). The ANCOVA model revealed that prematurity status was not independently associated with CDS severity after adjusting for covariates (p = .432). Instead, ADHD-inattention (p < .001), emotional problems (p = .001), and peer problems (p = .004) emerged as significant predictors of CDS severity. CONCLUSION: Prematurity status is not an independent risk factor for CDS in school-aged children. The variance in CDS severity is primarily accounted for by co-occurring psychopathological vulnerabilities, particularly inattention and internalizing social challenges. Clinical evaluations of preterm children should prioritize screening for these associated factors to better manage the risk of cognitive disengagement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zeyrek et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: