Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We investigate biendomorphism rings in right modules over commutative rings, suggesting key relationships.
We investigate right modules over commutative rings whose biendomorphism rings are division rings. First, we provide a complete characterization of such modules. We then establish a Schur-type converse in this setting, showing a precise interplay between a module and its biendomorphism ring. Specifically, let R be a commutative ring, M a right R-module, and L = End R (M). We prove that M, regarded as a left L-module, is simple if and only if End L (M) = BiEnd R (M) is a division ring. This result highlights that, for modules over commutative rings, simplicity over the endomorphism ring is equivalent to having a division biendomorphism ring, providing a clear module-theoretic converse to Schur's lemma.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
S. Safaeeyan (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: