PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 1, 2001Journal of Hypertension290 citations

Relation between blood pressure variability and carotid artery damage in hypertension: baseline data from the European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis (ELSA)

View Full Paper
GMGiuseppe ManciaGPGianfranco ParatiMHMichael Hennig

Key Result

In hypertensive patients, 24-hour systolic and pulse pressure variability were independently associated with carotid intima-media thickness (P<0.001).

Key Points

  • The study aims to assess the relationship between carotid intima-media thickness and blood pressure variability in hypertensive patients.
  • Analyzed baseline data from 1663 hypertensive patients in the European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis.
  • Carotid intima-media thickness was assessed from 12 carotid sites after a wash-out period from antihypertensive treatment.
  • Ambulatory blood pressure was measured every 15 minutes during the day and every 20 minutes at night.
  • IMT positively correlates with 24h average systolic blood pressure and pulse pressure.
  • IMT values are significantly related to 24h systolic blood pressure standard deviation (P < 0.001).
  • Multiple regression analysis shows that blood pressure variability is a determinant of carotid artery structure.

Study Design

Type

Cross-Sectional (n=1,663)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Is blood pressure variability associated with carotid intima-media thickness in hypertensive patients?

P
Population
1663 hypertensive patients, after a wash-out period from antihypertensive treatment (mean age 56.2 +/- 7.65 years)
I
Intervention
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (assessment of 24 h SBP or PP variability)
O
Outcome
Carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) assessed from 12 different carotid sitessurrogate

24-hour blood pressure fluctuations are independently associated with carotid artery structural alterations in hypertensive patients.

Main Result

p-value: p=<0.001

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Baseline data from the European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis (ELSA) have shown that carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) is not related to diastolic blood pressure (BP), but that it is related to clinic systolic (S) or pulse pressure (PP) and more so to their 24 h average values. The aim of the present study was to determine whether IMT independently relates to additional information obtained through ambulatory BP, in particular to SBP or PP variability. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 1663 hypertensive patients, after a wash-out period from antihypertensive treatment (mean age 56.2 +/- 7.65 years), IMT was assessed from 12 different carotid sites. Ambulatory BP measurements were performed every 15 min (day) and every 20 min (night). IMT values were positively related to 24 h, day and night average SBP and PP. There was some relationship of IMT with day-night or clinic-day SBP and PP differences. The most important finding, however, was that IMT values were related with 24 h SBP or PP standard deviation (P < 0.001), a measure of overall SBP or PP variability. The relationship was seen also by multiple regression analysis, the standard deviation for SBP or PP only following age and 24 h average SBP or PP in accounting for IMT values. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first demonstration from a large database that not only average 24 h PP and SBP values, but also 24 h BP fluctuations, are associated with, and possibly determinants of, the alterations of large artery structure in hypertension.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mancia et al. (2001) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension (n=1,663). Ambulatory blood pressure variability was evaluated on Carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) (p=<0.001). In hypertensive patients, 24-hour systolic and pulse pressure variability were independently associated with carotid intima-media thickness (P<0.001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1931ebff42a97fac57f1d3https://doi.org/10.1097/00004872-200111000-00008
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper