The microdilution plating method, using colony-forming units (CFU)/ml determinations from 10-microl droplets, was compared with the standard plate count in population analyses of methicillin-resistant and glycopeptide-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA and GISA) strains. Efficiency of plating plots yielded similar population resistance profiles for both methods with MRSA class 1-4 strains, laboratory-selected GISA strains of varying susceptibilities, two clinical GISA strains, as well as susceptible strains. A single heterogeneous MRSA, plated by both methods in 41 trials with and without 50 microg/ml oxacillin present, demonstrated no significant difference between the results of the two methods of colony counting (p > 0.05, and r = 0.67). Standard plating and microdilution plating produced mean resistant subpopulation determinations of one cell in 1.19 x 10(4) and 1.36 x 10(4), respectively. Population analyses carried out by microdilution plating require one-fourth or fewer of the plates used for standard plating, and both plating and colony counting required less time to perform.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pfeltz et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: