Key result
Lower physical activity independently predicted cardiac autonomic dysfunction in dyslipidaemia patients at an optimal cut-off of ≤1,558 MET-min/week (P=0.03).
Why the study?
To compare cardiac autonomic control across different physical activity levels in dyslipidaemia patients versus healthy controls, and evaluate the predictive ability of physical activity for cardiac autonomic dysfunction.
Does higher physical activity improve cardiac autonomic control in patients with dyslipidaemia?
Observational (n=68)
Does higher physical activity improve cardiac autonomic control in patients with dyslipidaemia?
p-value: p=<0.001
May flag autonomic risk via activity levels in dyslipidaemia; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
The objective of this study was to compare the cardiac autonomic control of dyslipidaemia patients engaged in different levels of physical activity and to determine the predictive ability of physical activity for cardiac autonomic dysfunction in these patients. This study also aimed to compare the cardiac autonomic control of dyslipidaemia patients and healthy adults. 52 patients (age: 49.1±4.53 years) with dyslipidaemia were recruited along with 16 healthy adults. Physical activity levels were assessed by International Physical Activity Questionnaire, and subjects were divided into three categories – low, moderate, and high physical activity. Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis was performed for obtaining time and frequency domain parameters. Presence of cardiac autonomic dysfunction was defined as standard deviation of N-N intervals <44 ms. HRV parameters were compared between 3 groups of dyslipidaemia patients and healthy controls. Predictive ability of physical activity for cardiac autonomic dysfunction in dyslipidaemia was evaluated after adjusting clinical covariates. There was a significant difference between low-frequency power (cardiac sympathetic control), and ratio of low- and high-frequency (HF) power (sympatho-vagal balance) in low versus moderate physical activity group and low versus high physical activity group ( P< 0.001). Significant differences were also observed for HFnu power (cardiac vagal activity) and total power between the dyslipidaemia groups. Physical activity was found to be a significant ( P= 0.03), independent predictor of cardiac autonomic dysfunction in dyslipidaemia patients. Findings of the present study suggest that cardiac autonomic profile of dyslipidaemia patients with different physical activity levels varied significantly. Dyslipidaemia patients engaged in moderate and high physical activity demonstrated significantly less sympathetic activity and better sympatho-vagal balance than those engaged in low levels of physical activity; also, vagal cardiac control was significantly greater in high physical activity group. Lower levels of physical activity determined the presence of cardiac autonomic dysfunction in these patients at an optimal cut-off value of ≤1,558 Metabolic Equivalent of Tasks- min/week.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anand et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Dyslipidaemia (n=68). Physical activity vs. Low physical activity was evaluated on Cardiac autonomic control (HRV parameters) and cardiac autonomic dysfunction (p=<0.001). Lower physical activity independently predicted cardiac autonomic dysfunction in dyslipidaemia patients at an optimal cut-off of ≤1,558 MET-min/week (P=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: