The assumption that major changes in pottery closely reflect change in other areas of culture has been widely accepted by prehistorians, but it has seldom been tested against independent historical or ethnographic evidence. It is here suggested, on the basis of dated pottery types and of independently dated historical developments, that there is not necessarily a close connection between the two. The evidence for this conclusion is derived from historically dated archaeological contexts in ancient and medieval Nubia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adams et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: