Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Although operating systems (OSes) are crucial to achieving high availability of computer systems, modern OSes are far from bug-free. Rebooting the OS is simple, powerful, and sometimes the only remedy for kernel failures. Once we accept reboot-based recovery as a fact of life, we should try to ensure that the downtime caused by reboots is as short as possible. This paper presents “phase-based” reboots that shorten the downtime caused by reboot-based recovery. The key idea is to divide a boot sequence into phases. The phase-based reboot reuses a system state in the previous boot if the next boot reproduces the same state. A prototype of the phase-based reboot was implemented on Xen 3.4.1 running para-virtualized Linux 2.6.18. Experiments with the prototype show that it successfully recovered from kernel transient failures inserted by a fault injector, and its downtime was 34.3 to 93.6% shorter than that of the normal reboot-based recovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamakita et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: