Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
• Disciplinary knowledge involves both content and relevant semiotic resources • Classroom interaction about disciplinary knowledge is visualised in a model • The model captures both knowledge and teaching towards the aim of students learning • Knowledge about forces in a primary school class is expressed at various levels. • The model shows how knowledge is communicated through seven science lessons Making meaning about disciplinary knowledge involves both disciplinary content and relevant semiotic resources (e.g., text structures) for communicating the content, as two sides of a coin. The purpose of this study is to contribute to research in science education with a model for visualising how the two sides of the coin are elaborated in classroom interaction, aiming to support students’ disciplinary knowledge development. The model was developed based on data from a series of lessons in a primary science classroom where the teacher and her students negotiated and made meaning about action and reaction forces. We show how the model can be used to deepen the understanding of how the meaning making through classroom interaction forms a pathway, visualising different levels of disciplinary literacy and hence the model's usefulness for both research and for designing teaching practices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nestlog et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: