Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To determine whether Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) practices characterizing initial resuscitation and interfacility transfer at rural trauma hospitals are associated with risk-adjusted survival.Retrospective, observational analysis of rural injured patient survival. Process-of-care variables were associated with TRISS (trauma and injury severity score)-derived Z-statistics (95% confidence intervals) for high-risk population subsets (defined below).all patients > or = 12 years of age entered into a statewide trauma system, January 1, 1995, to December 31, 1999, and initially presenting to Level III trauma centers (N = 4,961).pronounced dead on arrival (n = 26), directly admitted to hospital (n = 3), and unknown disposition at first hospital (n = 2). Process variables include: intubation in emergency department (ED) given Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score < 9 [INTUB], administration of blood products in ED given systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 90 mm Hg [BLOOD], trauma surgeon presence within 5 minutes of patient arrival given GCS < 9 mm Hg or SBP < 90 mm Hg [UNSTABLE-TS], trauma surgeon presence within 5 minutes of patient arrival given injury severity score (ISS) > 15 [ISS-TS], transfer to higher level of care given ISS > 20 and no hypotension [TRAN], transfer to higher level of care given GCS < 9 [TRAN-GCS].For the high-risk subpopulations, the following Z-scores (with and without an intervention) were found:Some ATLS interventions (BLOOD, TRAN, and TRAN-GCS) are associated with improved survival for selected high-risk subgroups in these 21 rural Level III trauma hospitals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hedges et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: