Key result
During the symptomatic period of COVID-19 infection, men demonstrated significantly larger increases in skin temperature, breathing rate, and heart rate, and larger decreases in heart rate variability compared to women.
Why the study?
To investigate sex-specific differences in the trajectory of four physiological parameters across a COVID-19 infection, considering sex as a biological variable in digital health.
Does patient sex influence the trajectory of physiological parameters (breathing rate, heart rate, heart rate variability, skin temperature) during a SARS-CoV-2 infection?
Observational (n=1,163)
Does patient sex influence the trajectory of physiological parameters (breathing rate, heart rate, heart rate variability, skin temperature) during a SARS-CoV-2 infection?
p-value: p=<0.0001
Men demonstrate larger deviations in physiological parameters such as heart rate and skin temperature during symptomatic COVID-19 infection compared to women, highlighting the need to consider sex as a biological variable in digital health algorithms.
May inform sex-specific thresholds in wearable COVID monitoring; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Considering sex as a biological variable in modern digital health solutions, we investigated sex-specific differences in the trajectory of four physiological parameters across a COVID-19 infection. A wearable medical device measured breathing rate, heart rate, heart rate variability, and wrist skin temperature in 1163 participants (mean age = 44.1 years, standard deviation [SD]=5.6; 667 [57%] females). Participants reported daily symptoms and confounders in a complementary app. A machine learning algorithm retrospectively ingested daily biophysical parameters to detect COVID-19 infections. COVID-19 serology samples were collected from all participants at baseline and follow-up. We analysed potential sex-specific differences in physiology and antibody titres using multilevel modelling and t-tests. Over 1.5 million hours of physiological data were recorded. During the symptomatic period of infection, men demonstrated larger increases in skin temperature, breathing rate and heart rate as well as larger decreases in heart rate variability than women. The COVID-19 infection detection algorithm performed similarly well for men and women. Our study belongs to the first research to provide evidence for differential physiological responses to COVID-19 between females and males, highlighting the potential of wearable technology to inform future precision medicine approaches. This work has received support from the Princely House of the Principality of Liechtenstein, the government of the Principality of Liechtenstein, the Hanela Foundation in Switzerland, and the Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) 2 Joint Undertaking under grant agreement No 101005177. This Joint Undertaking receives support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme and EFPIA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grossmann et al. (2023) conducted an observational in COVID-19 (n=1,163). Ava Fertility Tracker (wearable medical device) vs. Male vs Female was evaluated on Sex differences in physiological parameters (skin temperature, breathing rate, heart rate, heart rate variability) during the symptomatic period of COVID-19 infection (p=<0.0001). During the symptomatic period of COVID-19 infection, men demonstrated significantly larger increases in skin temperature, breathing rate, and heart rate, and larger decreases in heart rate variability compared to women.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: