It is well-known that maximum entropy distributions, subject to appropriate moment constraints, arise in physics and mathematics. In an attempt to find a physical reason for the appearance of maximum entropy distributions, the following theorem is offered. The conditional distribution of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Xₗ</tex> given the empirical observation <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">(1/n)∑ⁿᵢ=ₗh(Xᵢ)=α</tex> , where <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">X₁,X₂, ⋯</tex> are independent identically distributed random variables with common density <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">g</tex> converges to <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">fλ(x)=e^{λᵗh(X)}g(x)</tex> (Suitably normalized), where <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">λ</tex> is chosen to satisfy <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">∫ flambda(x)h(x)dx= α</tex> . Thus the conditional distribution of a given random variable <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">X</tex> is the (normalized) product of the maximum entropy distribution and the initial distribution. This distribution is the maximum entropy distribution when <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">g</tex> is uniform. The proof of this and related results relies heavily on the work of Zabell and Lanford.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Campenhout et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: