Why the study?
Are injectable lipid-lowering drugs (evolocumab, alirocumab, mipomersen) safe and well-tolerated in patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease?
Are injectable lipid-lowering drugs (evolocumab, alirocumab, mipomersen) safe and well-tolerated in patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease?
PCSK9 inhibitors demonstrate good safety and tolerability across various clinical conditions, whereas mipomersen requires further long-term safety data due to hepatic and injection-site adverse events.
Supports PCSK9 inhibitor tolerability in high-risk patients; leaves open long-term hepatic safety data for mipomersen.
INTRODUCTION: To answer the need of a better low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol control in statin-treated patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease, new injectable lipid-lowering drugs with innovative mechanisms of action are in advanced phase of development or have just been approved. AREAS COVERED: Evolocumab and alirocumab are fully human monoclonal antibodies inhibiting the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) that binds to hepatic LDL receptor and prevents it from normal recycling by targeting it for degradation. Mipomersen specifically binds to a segment of the human apolipoprotein B100 messenger RNA, blocking the translation of the gene product. Phase II (for evolocumab and alirocumab) and III (for evolocumab) trials show that PCSK9 inhibitors are equally well tolerated, with adverse events mainly limited to mild-to-moderate nasopharyngitis, injection-site pain, arthralgia and back pain. Mipomersen use is mainly associated to hepatosteatosis, increased transaminases (> 3 times the upper limit of normal), mild-to-moderate injection-site reactions and flu-like symptoms. EXPERT OPINION: PCSK9 inhibitors have demonstrated their good safety and tolerability in a large number of subjects with different clinical conditions, including statin-intolerance, enlarging their potential use in a broader range of patients. Further data on long-term mipomersen safety are required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cicero et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: