Why the study?
Increased left atrium epicardial fat tissue can lead to A-fib, but methods to characterize its topological pattern compared with non-fat tissue using persistent homology were unproven.
Can persistent homology distinguish between left atrium epicardial fat tissue and non-fat tissue on CT images in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Can persistent homology distinguish between left atrium epicardial fat tissue and non-fat tissue on CT images in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Topological data analysis using persistent homology can successfully differentiate left atrium epicardial fat from non-fat tissue on CT images, offering a potential new computational approach for imaging analysis in atrial fibrillation.
OBJECTIVE: Atrial Fibrillation (A-fib) is an abnormal heartbeat condition in which the heart races and beats in an uncontrollable way. It is observed that the presence of increased epicardial fat/fatty tissue in the atrium can lead to A-fib. Persistent homology using topological features can be used to recapitulate enormous amounts of spatially complicated medical data into a visual code to identify a specific pattern of epicardial fat tissue with non-fat tissue. Our aim is to evaluate the topological pattern of left atrium epicardial fat tissue with non-fat tissue. RESULTS: A topological data analysis approach was acquired to study the imaging pattern between the left atrium epicardial fat tissue and non-fat tissue patches. The patches of eight patients from CT images of the left atrium heart were used and categorized into "left atrium epicardial fat tissue" and "non-fat tissue" groups. The features that distinguish the "epicardial fat tissue" and "non-fat tissue" groups are extracted using persistent homology (PH). Our result reveals that our proposed research can discriminate between left atrium epicardial fat tissue and non-fat tissue. Specifically, the range of Betti numbers in the epicardial tissue is smaller (0-30) than the non-fat tissue (0-100), indicating that non-fat tissue has good topology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deepa et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: