Why the study?
Non-valvular atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia worldwide, and ranolazine is an emerging option for rhythm control requiring evaluation.
Does ranolazine added to rate-controlling therapy improve conversion to normal sinus rhythm in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Does ranolazine added to rate-controlling therapy improve conversion to normal sinus rhythm in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Ranolazine added to standard rate-controlling therapy significantly increases the rate of conversion to normal sinus rhythm in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
May support adjunctive ranolazine for sinus conversion on rate control in non-valvular AF; hypothesis-generating, needs randomized confirmation.
Objectives – Non- valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is the most commonly occurring arrhythmia worldwide .Ranolazine is an emerging drug with a ray of hope in the management of NVAF. This is the first large observational study with longer follow up of one year. Methods - It is a hospital based observational prospective study. A total of 100 patients was recruited for the study .The primary objective was to determine the efficacy of ranolazine in converting NVAF to sinus rhythm & the secondary objective was to study epidemiological aspects of NVAF. Results –After 1 month of follow up conversion to normal sinus rhythm was 12% in group A & 6% in group B (6%), it was not significant statistically (Z=1.48p=0.13). After 6 months, conversion to normal sinus rhythm was increased from 12% to 18% in group A which was preserved at 12 months of follow up and statistically significant and higher than that of group B (6.0%) (Z=2.61p=0.009). In predisposing risk factors & other co-morbidities HTN was present in 61%, obesity together with overweight in 37%, smoking in 44%, history of moderate amount of alcohol intake in 35%, history of CVA/TIA in 13%, DM in 11%, CKD in 4%, CAD in 30%, COPD in 20% and congestive heart failure in 15% of the patients. Conclusion- Ranolazine is an effective option when used for rhythm control strategy in NVAF. HTN is the predominant predisposing risk factor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shukla et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: