This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Purpose: In 2015, in Poland, the oncological package (OP) was established. This law constituted a fast track of oncological diagnosis and treatment and obligatory multidisciplinary team meetings (MDT). The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of OP on rectal cancer treatment. Methods: The study was a multicenter, retrospective analysis of data collected from five centers. It included clinical data of patients operated due to rectal cancer between 2013-2019. For most analyses, patients were categorized into three groups: 2013-2014 – before OP (A), 2015-2016- early development of OP (B), 2017-2019 – further OP functioning (C). Results: A total of 1418 patients were included. In all time intervals, the majority of operations performed were anterior resections. There was a significantly lower local tumor stage (T) observed in subsequent time intervals, while there were no significant differences for N and M. In period C median of resected nodes was significantly higher than in previous periods. Four of the centers showed an increasing tendency in the use of preoperative radiotherapy. The study indicated a significant increase in the use of short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) and a decrease in the number of patients who did not receive any form of preoperative therapy in subsequent periods. In the group that should receive radiotherapy (T3/4 or N+ and M0), the use of SCRT was also significantly increasing. Conclusion: In the whole cohort, there was a significant increase in the use of preoperative radiotherapy and decrease in T stage, changing with the development of OP. Nevertheless, this relation is indirect and more data should be gathered for further conclusions. Trial registration number at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04947020 Date of registration: 24 th of June 2021
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krzeszowiak et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: