Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The principle of causality requires that a pure power-law spectrum of cosmological density perturbations possess a super-Hubble suppression scale. We search for evidence of such suppression by performing a three parameter likelihood analysis of the COBE-DMR 4-year sky maps with respect to the amplitude, the spectral index, and the suppression scale. It is found that all suppression scales larger than c/H₀ are consistent with the data, but that scales of order c/H₀ are slightly preferred, at roughly the one-sigma level. Super-Hubble density fluctuations on very large scales (c/H₀) can only be explained in the context of present theory by a de Sitter expansion phase, whereas those that are ``small'' (~c/H₀) can also be explained within the standard hot big-bang model. Density perturbations originating after any conceivable de Sitter expansion phase or during non-isentropic de Sitter expansion have natural kinematic constraints which could explain a small super-Hubble suppression scale. Standard inflationary cosmology, which is characterized by isentropic de Sitter expansion, generically predicts that the particle horizon should be much larger than the present-day Hubble radius, c/H₀. For such scenarios, a small super-Hubble suppression scale would require the duration of the inflation epoch to be fairly short. Suppression scales smaller than c/H₀ are strongly excluded by the COBE data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berera et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: