Does three-parameter mSASHA improve the accuracy and precision of cardiac T1 and T2 mapping compared to existing techniques in phantoms and volunteers?
Three-parameter mSASHA provides highly accurate and precise cardiac T1 and T2 quantification in a single breath-hold, comparable to established techniques.
Purpose To develop and validate a three‐parameter model for improved precision multiparametric SAturation‐recovery single‐SHot Acquisition (mSASHA) cardiac T 1 and T 2 mapping with high accuracy in a single breath‐hold. Methods The mSASHA acquisition consists of nine images of variable saturation recovery and T 2 preparation in 11 heartbeats with T 1 and T 2 values calculated using a three‐parameter model. It was validated in simulations and phantoms at 3 T with comparison to a four‐parameter joint T 1 ‐T 2 technique. The mSASHA acquisition was compared with MOLLI, SASHA, and T 2 ‐prepared balanced SSFP in 10 volunteers. Results The mSASHA technique had high accuracy in phantoms compared to spin echo, with −0.2 ± 0.3% T 1 error and −2.4 ± 1.3% T 2 error. The mSASHA coefficient of variation in phantoms for T 1 was similar to MOLLI (0.7 ± 0.2% for both) and T 2 ‐prepared balanced SSFP for T 2 (1.3 ± 0.7% vs 1.4 ± 0.3%, adjusted p > .05 for both). In simulations, three‐parameter mSASHA had higher precision than four‐parameter joint T 1 ‐T 2 for both T 1 and T 2 (46% and 11% reductions in T 1 and T 2 interquartile range for native myocardium). In vivo myocardial mSASHA T 1 was similar to SASHA (1523 ± 18 ms vs 1520 ± 18 ms) with similar coefficient of variation to both MOLLI and SASHA (3.3 ± 0.6% vs 3.1 ± 0.6% and 3.3 ± 0.5% respectively, adjusted p > .05 for all). Myocardial mSASHA T 2 was 37.1 ± 1.1 ms with similar precision to T 2 ‐prepared balanced SSFP (6.7 ± 1.7% vs 6.0 ± 1.6%, adjusted p > .05). Conclusion Three‐parameter mSASHA provides high‐accuracy cardiac T 1 and T 2 quantification in a single breath‐hold with similar precision to MOLLI and T 2 ‐prepared balanced SSFP. Further study is required to both establish normative values and demonstrate clinical utility in patient populations.
Chow et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: