Why the study?
The study aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of non-contrast USG and CT scan in detecting fatty liver in Indonesian patients.
Does non-contrast USG have comparable diagnostic accuracy to CT Scan in detecting NAFLD in Indonesian patients aged 40 years or older?
Does non-contrast USG have comparable diagnostic accuracy to CT Scan in detecting NAFLD in Indonesian patients aged 40 years or older?
Non-contrast USG and CT scan offer comparable diagnostic accuracy for detecting NAFLD, suggesting test selection can be based on availability, cost, and patient preference.
Non-contrast USG may offer comparable NAFLD diagnostic accuracy to CT; leaves open need for prospective validation before practice change.
This study aimed to determine the accuracy of non-contrast USG and CT Scan in diagnosing fatty liver in Indonesian patients. Using a diagnostic test design with a cross-sectional approach, patients aged 40 years or older with laboratory examination results supporting NAFLD were selectively chosen from Dr. Soetomo Surabaya Hospital's Radiology Laboratory during February-March 2020. The study found that there is no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between non-contrast USG and CT Scan in detecting NAFLD. Moreover, the majority of patients with NAFLD were women, and the highest prevalence was observed in the middle age range of 40-49 years. These findings suggest that clinicians should consider these demographic characteristics when screening and managing NAFLD in their patients. The choice of diagnostic test should be based on factors such as availability, cost, and patient preference.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anggraheny Soelistyaningtyas (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Asian Journal of Medicine and Health