We use power transition theory and leadership long cycle theory's challenger model to investigate ongoing deep structural changes that may affect fundamentally the prospects for twenty-first century Sino-American conflict. We specifically evaluate which of these structural theories most accurately maps the power transition process. Whereas both theories offer important insights, the challenger model's focus on qualitative dimensions of structural change are more important to understanding the dynamics of a potential Sino-American power transition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rapkin et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: