This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This article explores the opportunities a GPN approach provides for understanding the network configurations and regional development impacts associated with extractive industries. The article elaborates two core claims: (i) that the application of the GPN analytical framework provides a way to make progress in a stalled policy debate regarding the linkages between resource extraction and socio-economic development (popularly known as the 'resource curse thesis'); and (ii) that the encounter between GPN and a natural resource-based sector introduces distinctive issues-associated with the materiality and territoriality of extractive commodities-that, to date, GPN has not considered fully. The article examines the global production network for oil as an empirical case of how extractive industries can provide (limited) opportunities for socio-economic development.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gavin Bridge (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: