We thank Olson et al. (1) for their close reading of our recent study (2), where we examined sensitivity and specificity of automated diabetic retinopathy detection and demonstrated an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.87. A limited, 500-patient sample of all 10,000 photographic exams was examined by multiple, masked experts. We felt uncomfortable recommending a system for clinical practice for which patient safety compared to an accepted (gold) standard could not be established, concluding that it should be tested against widely accepted clinical standards, if practical. We have recently presented studies of an improved algorithm on a new, larger dataset of 15,000 exams with an area under the curve of 0.90 …
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abràmoff et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: