Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The study employed an explanatory sequential mixed methods design to examine resilience, social connectedness, and re-suspension rates among youth in a community-based alternative-to-suspension program. Quantitative data were collected from a sample of 102 youth participants using a baseline and post measure of resilience and social connectedness. Additional suspension data were gathered three months after participation in the program. Qualitative data were collected from a nested sample of 15 youth who participated in interviews at the middle and high school levels. Findings demonstrate a significant program effect in resilience and social connectedness; however, inconclusive results were associated with re-suspension. Quantitative and qualitative converged around the valuable role the program played in promoting youth efficacy and positive connections with adults and peers. Implications for understanding the role community-based organizations (CBOs) play in the lives of suspended youth are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Henderson et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: