Why the study?
Obscure boundaries and large shape deformations from cardiac motion challenge the accurate automatic segmentation of anatomical structures on echocardiography.
Does DSANet improve echocardiography segmentation performance compared to state-of-the-art methods?
Does DSANet improve echocardiography segmentation performance compared to state-of-the-art methods?
The proposed DSANet improves automatic segmentation of cardiac structures in echocardiography, potentially advancing automated cardiac function assessment.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May advance automated echocardiography analysis; leaves open prospective clinical validation.
Echocardiography is an essential examination for cardiac disease diagnosis, from which anatomical structures segmentation is the key to assessing various cardiac functions. However, the obscure boundaries and large shape deformations due to cardiac motion make it challenging to accurately identify the anatomical structures in echocardiography, especially for automatic segmentation. In this study, we propose a dual-branch shape-aware network (DSANet) to segment the left ventricle, left atrium, and myocardium from the echocardiography. Specifically, the elaborate dual-branch architecture integrating shape-aware modules boosts the corresponding feature representation and segmentation performance, which guides the model to explore shape priors and anatomical dependence using an anisotropic strip attention mechanism and cross-branch skip connections. Moreover, we develop a boundary-aware rectification module together with a boundary loss to regulate boundary consistency, adaptively rectifying the estimation errors nearby the ambiguous pixels. We evaluate our proposed method on the publicly available and in-house echocardiography dataset. Comparative experiments with other state-of-the-art methods demonstrate the superiority of DSANet, which suggests its potential in advancing echocardiography segmentation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: