Recent work on metaphor processing often employs selectional preference information. We present a comparison of different approaches to the modelling of selectional preferences, based on various ways of generalizing over corpus frequencies. We evaluate on the VU Amsterdam Metaphor corpus, a broad corpus of metaphor. We find that using only selectional preference information is enough to outperform an all-metaphor baseline classification, but that generalization through prediction or clustering is not beneficial. A possible explanation for this lies in the nature of the evaluation data, and lack of power of selectional preference information on its own for non-novel metaphor detection. To better investigate the role of metaphor type in metaphor detection, we suggest a resource with annotation of novel metaphor should be created.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haagsma et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: