It is a widely recognised fact in the literature that Türkiye and Russia were on opposite sides in the history of the Karabakh conflict and pursued policies based on rivalry. However, Ankara could not support Azerbaijan sufficiently in the First Karabakh War due to many restrictive factors and both Azerbaijan and Türkiye were the losers of the war. However, in the Second Karabakh War, Azerbaijan’s economic and military strengthening and changing balances ensured that the winning side was the Baku-Ankara front. In addition, one of the important factors in Azerbaijan’s victory was Türkiye’s military and diplomatic support. The aim of this study is to reveal the ways in which Türkiye’s support to Azerbaijan was manifested in the Second Karabakh War and the acquisitions of Azerbaijan’s victory in terms of Türkiye-Azerbaijan axis. In this respect, the study is important in terms of revealing Ankara’s military and diplomatic support to Baku in the Türkiye-Russia rivalry within the framework of neoclassical variables. In this context, case analysis is used in the study from one of the qualitative research methods. Within the scope of this type of research, the ways in which Türkiye and Russia confronted each other in the Second Karabakh War and the means and methods of Türkiye’s support for Azerbaijan are determined. The study concluded that there was a rivalry between Türkiye and Russia in the Second Karabakh War and that one of the main determinants of this rivalry was Türkiye’s military and diplomatic support to Azerbaijan. In this direction, the study uses primary sources such as documents published by the official authorities of the parties and the statements of high-level officials of the countries, as well as secondary sources such as other periodicals in the literature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmet Turan (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: