Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article examines the emergence of Neo-Ottomanism in contemporary Turkey and its broader implications for Turkish society. It begins by exploring the various interpretations of this phenomenon, emphasizing its multifaceted nature and the political instrumentalization of imperial nostalgia. While this project may seem contemporary, it is, in fact, a recurring feature of modern Turkish history. We will analyze how its revival has shaped political discourse, national identity, and societal dynamics. The article then presents a range of political initiatives aimed at reintegrating Ottoman symbols into everyday life, illustrating how these efforts seek to reshape cultural identity and reinforce a sense of historical continuity. Furthermore, it delves into the economic, social, and political transformations driven by the Neo-Ottoman project, with particular attention to its impact on national policy, social cohesion, and daily life. Despite attempts to revive past grandeur, these transformations have not translated into tangible benefits for society. Instead, a growing disparity emerges between the rhetoric of imperial splendor and the economic struggles faced by citizens. By applying the concept of “malaise,” this study explores the tensions and contradictions within the Neo-Ottoman project, highlighting the disconnect between state-driven historical narratives and lived realities. Ultimately, it seeks to illuminate the complex dynamics of Neo-Ottomanism and the gap between political aspirations and everyday experiences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Julie Alev Dilmaç (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: