Why the study?
Does adenosine testing to guide additional ablation improve freedom from atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation?
Does adenosine testing to guide additional ablation improve freedom from atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation?
While adenosine testing effectively identifies dormant pulmonary vein conduction after PVI, its routine use to guide further ablation yields conflicting results regarding long-term freedom from atrial fibrillation.
The cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), which can be achieved in more than 95% of patients at the end of the procedure. However, AF recurrence rates remain high and are related to recovery of PV conduction. Adenosine testing is used to unmask dormant pulmonary vein conduction (DC). The aim of this study is to review the available literature addressing the role of adenosine testing and determine the impact of ablation at sites of PV reconnection on freedom from AF. Adenosine infusion, by restoring the excitability threshold, unmasks reversible injury that could lead to recovery of PV conduction. The studies included in this review suggest that adenosine is useful to unmask nontransmural lesions at risk of reconnection and that further ablation at sites of DC is associated with improvement in freedom from AF. Nevertheless it has been demonstrated that adenosine is not able to predict all veins at risk of later reconnection, which means that veins without DC are not necessarily at low risk. The role of the waiting period in the setting of adenosine testing has also been analyzed, suggesting that in the acute phase adenosine use should be accompanied by enough waiting time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dallaglio et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: