Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We present an algorithm that takes as input a graph G with weights on the vertices, and computes a maximum weight independent set S of G. If the input graph G excludes a path P k on k vertices as an induced subgraph, the algorithm runs in time n O(k2 log 3 n). Hence, for every fixed k our algorithm runs in quasi-polynomial time. This resolves in the affirmative an open problem of [Thomassé, SODA'20 invited presentation]. Previous to this work, polynomial time algorithms were only known for P 4 -free graphs [Corneil et al., DAM'81], P 5 -free graphs [Lokshtanov et al., SODA'14], and P 6 -free graphs [Grzesik et al., SODA'19]. For larger values of t, only 2 O(√{knlogn}) time algorithms [Bacsó et al., Algorithmica'19] and quasipolynomial time approximation schemes [Chudnovsky et al., SODA'20] were known. Thus, our work is the first to offer conclusive evidence that Independent Set on P k - free graphs is not NP-complete for any integer k. Additionally we show that for every graph H, if there exists a quasi-polynomial time algorithm for Independent Seton C-free graphs for every connected component C of H, then there also exists a quasi-polynomial time algorithm for Independent Set on H-free graphs. This lifts our quasi-polynomial time algorithm to T k -free graphs, where T k has one component that is a P k , and k-1 components isomorphic to a fork (the unique 5-vertex tree with a degree 3 vertex).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gartland et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: