Why the study?
Steerable sheaths are less commonly used during transseptal puncture, prompting evaluation of whether left atrial catheterization efficiency could be improved using the VersaCross combined steerable sheath and transseptal system compared to standard workflow.
Does the Versacross Workflow reduce transseptal puncture time and procedure time compared to standard workflow in patients undergoing RF ablation for AF?
Does the Versacross Workflow reduce transseptal puncture time and procedure time compared to standard workflow in patients undergoing RF ablation for AF?
The VersaCross combined steerable sheath and transseptal system significantly improves procedural efficiency by reducing transseptal puncture and overall ablation times in AF patients.
May shorten transseptal puncture in AF ablation; leaves open randomized confirmation of efficiency gains.
Introduction: While steerable sheaths are widely used to improve catheter stability and contact force during radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), steerable sheaths are less commonly used during transseptal puncture. This study evaluated whether left atrial catheterization efficiency can be improved using the VersaCross combined steerable sheath and transseptal system compared to previous standard workflow. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed AF ablation performed using the Versacross Workflow consisting of VersaCross steerable sheath and RF wire for transseptal puncture and catheter ablation (VCW) to the standard workflow using a fixed curve sheath with RF needle followed by exchange for an Agilis steerable sheath for catheter ablation (STW). Results: Thirty patients underwent RF ablation for paroxysmal or persistent AF, 15 using the VCW and 15 using the STW. Transseptal puncture time was 10.8 mins faster with the VCW compared to the standard workflow (20.9 ± 5.9 min vs. 31.7 ± 15.1 min; p=0.024). Time to left atrial catheterization was 40% faster with the VCW compared to the STW (21.3 ± 5.8 min vs. 35.2 ± 14.4 min; p=0.003). Overall procedure time was 14.2 min faster in the VCW compared to the STW (86.3 ± 16.1 min vs. 100.5 ± 19.3 min; p=0.044). Conclusions: Use of the VersaCross steerable system significantly reduced time to transseptal puncture, time to left atrial catheterization, and overall RF ablation time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Janardhan et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: