Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AbstractThe paper maintains that during the Iron I and much of the early Iron IIA the Shephelah was inhabited by independent—or at least autonomous— rural kinship groups that were not dominated by the 'United Monarchy'; that over the course of the early Iron IIA the region became increasingly politically dominated by the city-state of Gath; and that it was only after the destruction of Gath by Hazael in the 9th century BCE that the Shephelah eventually became part of the kingdom of Judah.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lehmann et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: