Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reaction of the diphosphine ligand i-Pr2P(CH2)5P(i-Pr)2 with NiBr2 at 110 °C gives a mixture of the 16-membered bimetallacycle {i-Pr2P(CH2)5P(i-Pr)2}2Ni2Br4, 1, and the pincer-type complex {(i-Pr2PCH2CH2)2CH}NiBr, 2; the latter can also be obtained by heating 1 in the presence of 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine or under vacuum. Complex 2 undergoes transmetalation with RMgCl or RLi to give {(i-Pr2PCH2CH2)2CH}NiR (R = Me (4), C≡CMe (5), Ph (6), n-Bu (7), and C≡CPh (8)); the phenylacetylide derivative 8 was also obtained from the reaction of PhC≡CH with 4, 5, or 7. The Ni−Me derivative 4 reacts with PhX (X = I, Br, Cl) to give the product of C−C coupling reaction (Ph−Me) and the Ni−X analogues of 2, and tests have shown that 2 is a competent catalytic precursor for the coupling of PhCl and MeMgCl. The available evidence suggests that this catalytic process does not involve Ni0 intermediates. Indeed, cyclic voltammetry measurements show that 2 can undergo two consecutive oxidations, and attempts to generate isolable high-valent species yielded the five-coordinate, 17-electron NiIII species {(i-Pr2PCH2CH2)2CH}NiX2, 9, from the reaction of 2 with FeX3 (X = Cl, Br). Characterization of all new complexes, including X-ray diffraction studies on single crystals of complexes 1−6 and 9, is described.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Castonguay et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: