Why the study?
Does a three-step radiographic procedure accurately determine left ventricle volumes with minimal operator-related error?
Does a three-step radiographic procedure accurately determine left ventricle volumes with minimal operator-related error?
The described three-step radiographic procedure allows for left ventricle volumetry with relative errors under 13% and no contribution to ejection fraction errors.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Offers low-error radiographic LV volumetry; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
A three-step radiographic procedure is described for the determination of left ventricle volumes, based on one lateral and two angled single plane images. The first angled image is taken to yield a minimally foreshortened LV image and the second image, at the same angle, is taken of a calibration sphere. Five sources of operator-related, or 'input', error are analysed, two of which are normally removable. The remaining three input errors are assessed using a commercial digital subtraction angiography system and comparisons with the analysis are given. A summary result is that relative errors in end-systolic and end-diastolic LV volumes, as well as cardiac output, should normally be less than 13% under reasonable operator care. The input errors should not contribute to errors in calculated ejection fractions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Douglas R. Wyman (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: