Computer simulation technology is used to define the problems in scale‐up of extruders from 2.5 to 3.5, 4.5, 6.0, and 8.0 inches in diameter. It is shown that the conventional practice of scaling‐up channel depths by the square root of the diameter ratio does not take full advantage of the potential output capacity of larger extruders and a faster rate of channel depth increase is proposed. It is also shown that inherent limitations resulting from decreasing barrel surface area and increasing flight clearance with increasing screw diameter will always result in a higher discharge temperature from the larger machine at any practical output rate. Frictional heat generation and heat removal requirements increase with increasing diameter, regardless of the scale‐up system used, and these limit the output capability of the larger sizes at low discharge temperatures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bruce H. Maddock (1974) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: