Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study examines how consumers from two different cultures react to the luxury brand retailer co-branding strategy. A 2 (Familiarity: Familiar vs. Unfamiliar) × 2 (Product Fit: Fit vs. Unfit) × 2 (Brand Fit: Fit vs. Unfit) × 2 (Country: U.S. vs. Indonesia) between-subjects design was conducted. The results show that co-branding with retailers is not a good strategy for luxury brands in Indonesia, which is characterized by a high level of collectivism. However, consumers in the U.S., which is characterized by a low level of collectivism, demonstrate a positive attitude change toward the luxury brand when they are not familiar with the luxury brand or when the luxury brand collaborates with a high-end retailer. This study provides some valuable insights for luxury brands regarding their expansion strategy into foreign countries. One contribution is that we demonstrate that cross-cultural theories on brand extension and co-branding literature might not be applied to luxury brands. We find that Hofstede's power distance and individualism/collectivism dimensions could be used to explain the discrepancy. We also provide valuable insights for co-branding strategy for luxury brands.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: