Why the study?
Multiple clinical trials inhibiting the myostatin pathway failed to produce conclusive results, prompting investigation into whether GASP-1 or GASP-2 might represent a potential therapeutic.
Does GASP-2 overexpression increase muscle mass without metabolic defects compared to GASP-1 overexpression in mice?
Does GASP-2 overexpression increase muscle mass without metabolic defects compared to GASP-1 overexpression in mice?
GASP-2 overexpression increases muscle mass without the metabolic defects associated with GASP-1, suggesting it may be a more favorable therapeutic target for muscle atrophy.
Muscle atrophy is associated with many diseases including genetic disorders, sarcopenia, or cachexia syndromes. Myostatin ( Mstn ), a transforming growth factor‐beta (TGF‐β) member, plays a key role in skeletal muscle homeostasis as a powerful negative regulator. Over the last decade, about 15 clinical trials aimed at inhibiting the Mstn pathway, failed to produce conclusive results. In this context, we investigated whether growth and differentiation factor‐associated serum protein‐1 (GASP‐1) or GASP‐2, two natural inhibitors of Mstn , might represent a potential therapeutic. As we previously reported, mice overexpressing Gasp‐1 ( Tg(Gasp‐1) ) present an increase of muscle mass but develop metabolic disorders with aging. Here, we showed that overexpression of Gasp‐2 increases the muscular mass without metabolic defects. We also found that Tg(Gasp‐2) mice displayed, like Mstn –/– mice, a switch from slow‐ to fast‐twitch myofibers whereas Tg(Gasp‐1) mice exhibit a reverse switch. Our studies supported the fact that GASP‐2 has less affinity than GASP ‐ 1 for Mstn , leading to a constitutive Mstn upregulation only in Tg(Gasp‐1) mice, responsible for the observed phenotypic differences. Altogether, our findings highlighted a gene expression regulatory network of TGF‐β members and their inhibitors in muscle.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parenté et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: