Why the study?
Does exercise training reduce unscheduled hospital visits without increasing stent thrombosis in patients with stable coronary artery disease after successful coronary stenting?
Does exercise training reduce unscheduled hospital visits without increasing stent thrombosis in patients with stable coronary artery disease after successful coronary stenting?
Moderate exercise training after successful coronary stenting is safe, not increasing stent thrombosis risk, and effectively reduces unscheduled hospital visits for worsening angina.
Supports exercise safety post-stenting without thrombosis signal; hypothesis-generating, needs RCTs before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Exercise training (ET) after coronary stenting is considered to have a risk of stent thrombosis (ST). The present study investigated whether ET increases the incidence of ST in patients undergoing coronary stenting. METHODS AND RESULTS: The current study was a prospective observational study. We enrolled 3,672 patients who underwent successful coronary stenting. Patients decided whether to participate in exercise and were divided into an ET group (n=1,592) and a control group (n=2,080). The primary endpoint was the incidence of ST. Secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: death, myocardial infarction, and stroke) and unscheduled hospital visits for angina. The incidence of ST and MACE were similar in both groups (1.8% vs. 2.0%, P=0.73, 14.9% vs. 15.0%, P=0.97, respectively). Unscheduled hospital visits were significantly lower in the ET group (20.2% vs. 27.2%, P<0.0001). After adjusting for baselines, the ET group had no significant increase in ST (hazard ratio (HR) 0.86, adjusted P=0.56) and MACE (HR 0.98, adjusted P=0.83). The ET was effective to prevent an unscheduled hospital visits for worsening angina (HR 0.67, adjusted P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Moderate ET after successful coronary stenting does not increase the incidence of ST and MACE, and was effective in reducing unscheduled hospital visits for angina.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Soga et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: